ECONOMIC AND AGRONOMIC ASSESSMENT OF REDGRAM (CAJANUS CAJAN) AS AN ALTERNATIVE TO COTTON IN RAINFED LIGHT SOILS OF TELANGANA: A THREE-YEAR ON FARM EVALUATION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4238/f5071032Keywords:
Cajanus cajan; cotton; rainfed agriculture; light-textured soils; on-farm trial; net returns; benefit:cost ratioAbstract
On-farm trial entitled economic and agronomic assessment of redgram (cajanus cajan) as an alternative to cotton in rainfed light soils of Telangana: a three-year on-farm evaluation was conducted during kharif 2018–19, 2019–20 and 2020–21 at 15 farmer-field locations in villages adopted by Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Garimellapadu, Bhadradri Kothagudem district, Telangana, India. Rainfed farmers cultivating light-textured soils face production uncertainty and high input costs, making crop choice an important component of risk management. Three practices were compared: T1, redgram (pigeonpea; Cajanus cajan) at 90 × 60 cm with nipping at 45 days after sowing (DAS) and mepiquat chloride at 2 ml per 10 L water at flower initiation and peak flowering; T2, redgram at 90 × 60 cm without the additional interventions; and T3, cotton under farmer practice. Across the three-year summary, mean redgram yield was 1,297 kg ha⁻¹ in T1 and 1,214 kg ha⁻¹ in T2, compared with 1,458 kg ha⁻¹ in cotton. Despite lower yield, T1 recorded the highest mean net return (₹42,953 ha⁻¹) and benefit:cost ratio (2.36), while cotton recorded ₹24,145 ha⁻¹ and 1.44, respectively. Relative to cotton, T1 reduced cultivation cost by 42.8% and increased net returns by 77.9%; T2 reduced cultivation cost by 44.2% and increased net returns by 61.4%. T1 also recorded more primary and secondary branches per plant than T2 and cotton. The results indicate that every aspect of crop cultivation redgram at 90 × 60 cm with nipping at 45 days after sowing (DAS) and mepiquat chloride at 2 ml per 10 L water at flower initiation and peak flowering showed lower costs and more returns and cotton have shown higher costs and lower returns.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

