IMMUNOPROFILE OF HODGKIN LYMPHOMA AND EXPRESSION OF IMP3 IN CLASSICAL HODGKIN LYMPHOMA, NODULAR LYMPHOCYTE-PREDOMINANT HODGKIN LYMPHOMA AND DIFFUSE LARGE B-CELL LYMPHOMA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4238/9wytc560Keywords:
Hodgkin lymphoma; classical Hodgkin lymphoma; nodular lymphocyte-predominant Hodgkin lymphoma; diffuse large B-cell lymphoma; IMP3; IGF2BP3; immunohistochemistry.Abstract
Background: Accurate distinction among classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL), nodular lymphocyte-predominant Hodgkin lymphoma (NLPHL), and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) may be challenging because of overlapping morphologic and immunophenotypic features. This study evaluated the immunoprofile of Hodgkin lymphoma and assessed insulin-like growth factor II mRNA-binding protein 3 (IMP3) expression across cHL, NLPHL, and DLBCL. Methods: A retrospective and prospective study was conducted over a two-year period at Madras Medical College/Rajiv Gandhi Government General Hospital. Fifty specimens were included: 25 cHL, 2 NLPHL, and 23 DLBCL. Histopathological sections were reviewed and immunohistochemistry was performed using CD3, CD20, CD15, CD30, and IMP3. Categorical variables were assessed using chi-square/Fisher exact tests as appropriate, with P<0.05 considered statistically significant. Results: The study included 37 males and 13 females; 41 cases were nodal and 9 were extranodal. Among cHL cases, mixed cellularity was the predominant subtype (22/25, 88%). CD15 and CD30 were positive in 22/25 (88%) and 25/25 (100%) cHL cases, respectively. IMP3 showed cytoplasmic positivity in 20/25 (80%) cHL cases, 2/2 (100%) NLPHL cases, and 18/23 (78.3%) DLBCL cases based on the detailed subgroup counts in the study results. These findings indicate that IMP3 positivity occurs in both Hodgkin and large B-cell lymphomas and therefore does not reliably distinguish cHL/NLPHL from DLBCL. Conclusion: IMP3 may serve as a supplementary immunohistochemical marker because of its cytoplasmic staining in Hodgkin/Reed-Sternberg or lymphocyte-and-histiocyte cells with relatively limited background staining. However, its expression in DLBCL limits its discriminatory value. Larger studies with standardized scoring and validated antibody protocols are required.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

