AIRWAY MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES IN INFANTS BORN WITH PIERRE ROBIN SEQUENCE (PRS): A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS OF EFFECTIVENESS

Authors

  • Omar Suhaym Author
  • Nasser S. Alshahrani Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4238/29ww5c94

Keywords:

Pierre Robin Sequence; Airway Management; Infants; Airway Obstruction; Respiratory Management; Systematic Review; Meta-Analysis.

Abstract

Background: Pierre Robin sequence (PRS) is characterized by micrognathia, glossoptosis, and upper airway obstruction (UAO). Different management strategies exist, each with its own efficacy and clinical outcomes. Objective: To critically evaluate and compare the efficacy of conservative, orthodontic, and surgical airway interventions in neonates and infants with PRS, using polysomnographic (PSG) and clinical outcomes. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted per PRISMA guidelines. Databases (PubMed, Embase, Medline, etc.) were searched for studies (2017-2025) reporting pre- and post-intervention PSG data. Seventeen studies (n=1,291 patients) met the inclusion criteria. Risk of bias was assessed using the ROBINS-I tool. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed for Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesis (MDO) outcomes. Results: This study analysis reveals a critical finding: while all modalities can be effective, their efficacy is stratified. Conservative management (prone positioning, nasopharyngeal airway) achieved significant improvement, with 84.2% of patients attaining an AHI <5, supporting its role as a first-line strategy. However, MDO demonstrated superior and statistically significant efficacy in resolving severe obstruction, with meta analysis showing drastic improvements in OAHI (MD: -36.29, CI: -43.39 to -29.18, p<0.00001), AHI (p<0.00001), SpO₂ nadir (MD: +12.91%, p<0.00001), and end-tidal CO₂ (p<0.00001). Notably, MDO did not significantly improve weight gain (p=0.24) or sleep efficiency (p=0.51). Tongue-lip adhesion (TLA) was effective (89.5% achieved AHI<5) but was associated with higher recurrence rates than MDO. Orthodontic appliances (SOAP, PEBP) emerged as a highly promising non-surgical intervention, significantly reducing OAHI (e.g., from 39.3 to 12.2 events/h, p<0.001) and potentially obviating the need for surgery in selected cases. Conclusion: Management of PRS-related UAO requires a severity-based, stepwise algorithm. Conservative and orthodontic interventions are effective first-line options for a majority of patients. For severe, refractory cases, MDO is the most effective surgical intervention for rapidly securing the airway, though its impact on nutritional and sleep quality metrics remains limited.

Downloads

Published

2026-10-05

Issue

Section

Articles