EFFICACY OF PLATELET-RICH PLASMA NASAL PACKING IN ENDOSCOPIC SINUS SURGERY: A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMISED CONTROLLED SPLIT-NOSE STUDY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4238/29aqa264Keywords:
Platelet-rich plasma; Endoscopic sinus surgery; Chronic rhinosinusitis; Nasal packing; Lund–Kennedy score; Synechiae; Wound healingAbstract
Background: Mucosal re-epithelialisation after functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) determines long-term surgical success, yet conventional nasal packing does little to promote it. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is an autologous concentrate of growth factors with established pro-healing, angiogenic and anti-inflammatory activity. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of PRP-impregnated nasal packing on post-operative mucosal healing, bleeding, crusting, infection and synechiae formation after FESS for chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). Methods: A prospective randomised controlled split-nose trial was conducted on 63 patients aged 18–60 years with medically refractory CRS and a Lund–Mackay score above 8. In each patient, one nasal cavity was packed with a PRP impregnated pack and the contralateral cavity with a saline-impregnated pack, allocated by an alternate-sequence method, so that every patient served as his or her own control. Packs were removed at 48 hours by a single blinded endoscopist. Sides were graded using the Lund–Kennedy endoscopic score at weeks 1, 2, 4 and 8, and SNOT-22 was recorded before surgery and at week 8. Paired comparisons used the Wilcoxon signed-rank and McNemar exact tests. Results: Lund–Kennedy scores were significantly lower on the PRP side at every visit. At week 8 the PRP side scored 0.76 ± 0.71 versus 1.35 ± 0.74 on the saline side (mean difference 0.59, 95% CI 0.38–0.79; p < 0.001; Cohen's d = 0.81). At 48-hour pack removal the PRP side showed less bleeding (1.29 ± 0.73 vs 1.86 ± 0.69; p < 0.001), less crusting (23, 36.5% vs 46, 73.0%; p < 0.001) and less pain (1.16 ± 0.65 vs 1.76 ± 0.64; p < 0.001). Crusting was significantly reduced on the PRP side from week 2 onwards, and synechiae at week 8 occurred in 3 sides (4.8%) on the PRP side versus 11 (17.5%) on the saline side (p = 0.039). Infection rates did not differ. SNOT-22 improved from 54.5 ± 9.5 to 22.7 ± 5.2 (mean reduction 31.9 points; p < 0.001). Conclusion: PRP-impregnated nasal packing is a safe, inexpensive, autologous adjunct that accelerates mucosal healing and significantly reduces bleeding, crusting, pain and synechiae formation after endoscopic sinus surgery, without increasing infective risk.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

