RECONCEIVING SUSTAINABILITY IN INDIA'S FARMER PRODUCER ORGANIZATIONS: A FIELD-GROUNDED CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK

Authors

  • Shrikanta Mohanta Author
  • Nabakishore Parida Author
  • Srilata Pattanaik Author
  • Bibhu Santosh Behera Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4238/51q02966

Keywords:

Farmer Producer Organizations, Producer Companies, Sustainability, Collective Action, Governance, Trust Capital, Member Ownership, Rural Institutions, Agricultural Value Chains, India.

Abstract

Farmer Producer Organizations (FPOs) have become one of India's central institutional strategies for uplifting small and marginal cultivators through pooled resources, aggregation, value addition, and stronger market linkages. Yet despite a decade of vigorous policy backing and rapid growth in the number of registered FPOs, many organizations struggle to remain viable once initial handholding support ends. Most existing research and government evaluations judge FPO sustainability chiefly through turnover, profit, membership numbers, and continuity of operations. These are meaningful metrics, but they miss the institutional, social, and environmental dynamics that ultimately decide whether an FPO matures into a durable, farmer-owned enterprise. This paper contends that sustainability is not reducible to financial performance alone. Drawing on a practice-based conceptual method, it weaves together existing scholarship, policy frameworks, and the author's own decade-plus experience building, mentoring, governing, and reviving FPOs in Odisha, Madhya Pradesh, and Uttar Pradesh. Cases spanning tribal producer companies, single-commodity enterprises, women-led organizations, natural farming collectives, and revived dormant FPOs are used to surface institutional patterns that existing scholarship has largely overlooked. From this synthesis, the paper proposes an Integrated Sustainability Framework for Farmer Producer Organizations (ISF–FPO), which frames sustainability as the interplay of four mutually reinforcing dimensions — financial, institutional, member, and ecological sustainability — bound together by what the paper terms trust capital. The argument is that an FPO's worth should not be judged by how much profit or turnover it generates, but by whether it produces enough surplus to cover its operating and human-resource costs while simultaneously deepening member ownership, institutional independence, environmental care, and lasting value for its farmer-shareholders. The paper's contribution lies in offering a conceptual model, rooted in practice, that connects policy design with the realities of implementation — useful to researchers, policymakers, promoting agencies, lenders, and FPO leadership alike as they build sharper indicators and strategies for long term FPO viability.

Downloads

Published

2026-09-14

Issue

Section

Articles