RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN TINNITUS SEVERITY AND AUDIOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS IN ADULTS WITH STIFFNESS-INDUCED CONDUCTIVE HEARING LOSS

Authors

  • Mayank Mehra Author
  • Vivek Kumar Jha Author
  • Omprakash Preyadarshi Author
  • Pawan Kumar Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4238/h78tw978

Keywords:

tinnitus; conductive hearing loss; middle-ear stiffness; acoustic reflex; tympanometry; pure-tone audiometry; Tinnitus Handicap Inventory

Abstract

Background: Tinnitus may occur in association with conductive hearing disorders and altered middle-ear mechanics. Acoustic reflex testing provides an additional objective measure of middle-ear and stapedius muscle function. Objective: To compare the presence of acoustic reflexes in adults with subjective tinnitus and stiffness-induced conductive hearing loss with adults having normal hearing sensitivity and no tinnitus. Methods: A cross-sectional comparative study included 100 adults aged 25–70 years: 50 participants with subjective tinnitus and stiffness-induced conductive hearing loss and 50 controls with normal hearing sensitivity and no tinnitus. Participants underwent pure-tone audiometry, tympanometry, and acoustic reflex assessment. In the case group, tinnitus-related handicap was assessed using the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory. Categorical between-group differences in acoustic-reflex presence were assessed using Pearson's chi-square test. Results: Both groups contained 25 males and 25 females. Acoustic reflexes were present in 28/50 (56%) cases and 45/50 (90%) controls, while absent in 22/50 (44%) and 5/50 (10%), respectively. The between-group difference was statistically significant (χ² = 14.66, df = 1, p = 0.0001). In the case group, hearing-loss severity comprised 15 (30%) mild, 30 (60%) moderate, and 5 (10%) moderately severe cases. Conclusion: Adults with tinnitus and stiffness-induced conductive hearing loss showed a lower proportion of measurable acoustic reflexes than controls with normal hearing sensitivity and no tinnitus. Acoustic reflex assessment may provide useful complementary information during audiological evaluation of this clinical population.

Downloads

Published

2026-08-27

Issue

Section

Articles