DETERMINANTS AND OUTCOMES OF CLIMATE-SMART AGRICULTURE ADOPTION AMONG FARMERS: A BIBLIOMETRIC AND THEMATIC REVIEW
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4238/xeds1p02Keywords:
climate-smart agriculture; climate change adaptation; smallholder farmers; adoption determinants; bibliometric analysis; food security.Abstract
Climate change poses an escalating threat to smallholder and commercial agriculture alike, prompting a rapidly expanding body of research on how farmers perceive, adopt and benefit from climate-smart agriculture (CSA) and related adaptation practices. This review combines a bibliometric analysis with a comprehensive thematic synthesis of 138 peer-reviewed, open-access journal articles indexed in Scopus and published between 2015 and 2025. Using Biblioshiny and VOSviewer outputs for annual scientific production, source and country contributions and keyword co-occurrence networks, the review first maps the intellectual structure of the field. It then synthesises findings across six recurring themes: the socio economic and institutional determinants of CSA adoption; gender dimensions of access and use; barriers and constraints; the range of CSA practices and adaptation strategies documented; impacts on productivity, income, food security and livelihoods; and the methodological approaches used to study adoption behaviour. The literature is heavily concentrated in Sub-Saharan Africa and South/Southeast Asia, dominated by cross-sectional household-survey designs analysed with binary, multivariate and ordered probit or logit models, with an emerging but still limited use of experimental and life cycle approaches. Findings converge on a consistent set of adoption drivers-extension access, credit, land tenure security, farmer organisations, education and prior climate-risk experience-while gender, tenure and information asymmetries remain persistent constraints. The review concludes by identifying methodological, geographic and conceptual gaps, including a shortage of longitudinal and quasi-experimental impact evaluations, limited attention to Latin America and Central Asia and inconsistent conceptualisation of adoption itself and outlines priorities for future research and policy.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

