ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE-DRIVEN PULMONARY NODULE IDENTIFICATION VIA COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY: TECHNOLOGICAL PROGRESS, UNRESOLVED HURDLES, AND EMERGING HORIZONS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4238/t8daeg31Keywords:
Pulmonary nodule identification; Deep learning; CT-based screening; Convolutional neural networks; Explainable AI; Lung cancer surveillanceAbstract
Globally, lung malignancy stands as the foremost oncological cause of death, responsible for roughly 2.5 million incident cases and 1.8 million fatalities recorded in 2022. Stage-specific prognosis diverges sharply: patients whose tumors are identified at an early, localized phase achieve five-year survival exceeding 80%, whereas those diagnosed at stage III or IV face outcomes below 10%. Despite low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) having been adopted as the recommended modality for population-level screening programs, reliably identifying sub-centimeter pulmonary nodules remains technically demanding, and interpretation variability across radiologists constitutes a persistent clinical problem. This systematic review evaluates the contribution of deep learning (DL) to automating nodule detection, volumetric segmentation, and malignancy risk stratification from CT examinations. Through a structured search of PubMed, Scopus, and IEEE Xplore spanning 2018 through 2025, we synthesize evidence on convolutional architectures, three-dimensional encoder–decoder networks, attention-augmented models, and vision transformer frameworks. Leading systems attain sensitivity figures between 92% and 96%, with Competition Performance Metric (CPM) values surpassing 0.90 on the LUNA16 benchmark. Generative adversarial approaches have shown promise in mitigating training-data scarcity, while gradient-weighted class activation mapping (Grad-CAM) has emerged as an important transparency tool for clinical adoption. Although DL markedly elevates both throughput and diagnostic fidelity, persistent barriers, including cross-scanner generalization, residual false-positive burden, limited model interpretability, and regulatory compliance demands, must be addressed before routine clinical integration can be realized.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

