Reply to commentary by Dr. Jürgen Reichling and associates on the article “Genotoxicity and mutagenicity of Rosmarinus officinalis (Labiatae) essential oil in mammalian cells in vivo”, published in Genetics and Molecular Research (2010); 9(4): 2114-2122.

E.L. Maistro
Published: June 14, 2011
Genet. Mol. Res. 10 (2) : 1095-1097
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4238/vol10-2gmr1481

Cite this Article:
E.L. Maistro (2011). Reply to commentary by Dr. Jürgen Reichling and associates on the article “Genotoxicity and mutagenicity of Rosmarinus officinalis (Labiatae) essential oil in mammalian cells in vivo”, published in Genetics and Molecular Research (2010); 9(4): 2114-2122.. Genet. Mol. Res. 10(2): 1095-1097. https://doi.org/10.4238/vol10-2gmr1481

ABSTRACT

From a genetic point of view, the data obtained with the routinely conducted micronucleus, comet and chromosome aberration assays and their interpretation are correct. However, upon checking the manuscript, we detected that two critical concerns pointed out by Dr. Reichling and associates are valid. Comparing the first version of the article sent for publication in GMR and the last, after the review process and language corrections, the conclusion sentence was published incompletely and the words “of it and” added in the Introduction section about the work of Lemonica et al. (1996) made the sentence incorrect. Read More . . .

DOWNLOAD FULL PDF

Reply to commentary by Dr. Jürgen Reichling and associates on the article “Genotoxicity and mutagenicity of Rosmarinus officinalis (Labiatae) essential oil in mammalian cells in vivo”, published in Genetics and Molecular Research (2010); 9(4): 2114-2122.

Related Posts