Publications
Found 5 results
Filters: Author is D.Y. Yang [Clear All Filters]
, “Lenalidomide affect expression level of cereblon protein in multiple myeloma cell line RPMI8226”, vol. 14, pp. 13588-13594, 2015.
, “Protection against Taenia pisiformis larval infection induced by a recombinant oncosphere antigen vaccine”, vol. 13, pp. 6148-6159, 2014.
, “Synonymous codon usage patterns in different parasitic platyhelminth mitochondrial genomes”, vol. 12, pp. 587-596, 2013.
Brown WM, George M Jr and Wilson AC (1979). Rapid evolution of animal mitochondrial DNA. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 76: 1967-1971.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.76.4.1967
PMid:109836 PMCid:383514
Bulmer M (1991). The selection-mutation-drift theory of synonymous codon usage. Genetics 129: 897-907.
PMid:1752426 PMCid:1204756
Chiapello H, Lisacek F, Caboche M and Henaut A (1998). Codon usage and gene function are related in sequences of Arabidopsis thaliana. Gene 209: GC1-GC38.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1119(97)00671-9
Duret L and Mouchiroud D (1999). Expression pattern and, surprisingly, gene length shape codon usage in Caenorhabditis, Drosophila, and Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96: 4482-4487.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.96.8.4482
PMid:10200288 PMCid:16358
Fadiel A, Lithwick S, Wanas MQ and Cuticchia AJ (2001). Influence of intercodon and base frequencies on codon usage in filarial parasites. Genomics 74: 197-210.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/geno.2001.6531
PMid:11386756
Fadiel AA, Lithwick S and Gamra MM (2002). Codon usage analysis of Ascaris species influence of base and intercodon frequencies on the synonymous codon usage. J. Egypt. Soc. Parasitol. 32: 625-638.
PMid:12214939
Fickett JW (1982). Recognition of protein coding regions in DNA sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 10: 5303-5318.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/10.17.5303
PMid:7145702 PMCid:320873
Grantham R, Gautier C, Gouy M, Mercier R, et al. (1980). Codon catalog usage and the genome hypothesis. Nucleic Acids Res. 8: r49-r62.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/8.1.197-c
PMid:6986610 PMCid:327256
Hua J and Lee RW (2012). Factors affecting codon bias in the mitochondrial genomes of the streptophyte Mesostigma viride and the chlorophyte Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. J. Eukaryot. Microbiol. 59: 287-289.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1550-7408.2011.00613.x
PMid:22340021
Ikemura T (1981). Correlation between the abundance of Escherichia coli transfer RNAs and the occurrence of the respective codons in its protein genes: a proposal for a synonymous codon choice that is optimal for the E. coli translational system. J. Mol. Biol. 151: 389-409.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-2836(81)90003-6
Jia W and Higgs PG (2008). Codon usage in mitochondrial genomes: distinguishing context-dependent mutation from translational selection. Mol. Biol. Evol. 25: 339-351.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msm259
PMid:18048402
Karlin S and Mrazek J (1996). What drives codon choices in human genes? J. Mol. Biol. 262: 459-472.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jmbi.1996.0528
PMid:8893856
Liu H, He R, Zhang H, Huang Y, et al. (2010). Analysis of synonymous codon usage in Zea mays. Mol. Biol. Rep. 37: 677-684.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11033-009-9521-7
PMid:19330534
Liu Q, Feng Y and Xue Q (2004). Analysis of factors shaping codon usage in the mitochondrion genome of Oryza sativa. Mitochondrion 4: 313-320.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mito.2004.06.003
PMid:16120394
Lloyd AT and Sharp PM (1992). Evolution of codon usage patterns: the extent and nature of divergence between Candida albicans and Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nucleic Acids Res. 20: 5289-5295.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/20.20.5289
PMid:1437548 PMCid:334333
Luo XL, Xu JG and Ye CY (2011). Analysis of synonymous codon usage in Shigella flexneri 2a strain 301 and other Shigella and Escherichia coli strains. Can. J. Microbiol. 57: 1016-1023.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/w11-095
PMid:22112197
Ma J, Zhou T, Gu W, Sun X, et al. (2002). Cluster analysis of the codon use frequency of MHC genes from different species. Biosystems 65: 199-207.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0303-2647(02)00016-3
Martin AP, Naylor GJ and Palumbi SR (1992). Rates of mitochondrial DNA evolution in sharks are slow compared with mammals. Nature 357: 153-155.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/357153a0
PMid:1579163
Moriyama EN and Powell JR (1998). Gene length and codon usage bias in Drosophila melanogaster, Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Escherichia coli. Nucleic Acids Res. 26: 3188-3193.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/26.13.3188
PMid:9628917 PMCid:147681
Musto H, Cruveiller S, D'Onofrio G, Romero H, et al. (2001). Translational selection on codon usage in Xenopus laevis. Mol. Biol. Evol. 18: 1703-1707.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a003958
PMid:11504850
Oresic M and Shalloway D (1998). Specific correlations between relative synonymous codon usage and protein secondary structure. J. Mol. Biol. 281: 31-48.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jmbi.1998.1921
PMid:9680473
Osawa S, Ohama T, Yamao F, Muto A, et al. (1988). Directional mutation pressure and transfer RNA in choice of the third nucleotide of synonymous two-codon sets. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 85: 1124-1128.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.85.4.1124
PMid:2448791 PMCid:279718
Powell JR and Moriyama EN (1997). Evolution of codon usage bias in Drosophila. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94: 7784-7790.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.94.15.7784
PMid:9223264 PMCid:33704
Ramirez V, Savoie P and Morais R (1993). Molecular characterization and evolution of a duck mitochondrial genome. J. Mol. Evol. 37: 296-310.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00175506
PMid:8230253
Romero H, Zavala A and Musto H (2000). Codon usage in Chlamydia trachomatis is the result of strand-specific mutational biases and a complex pattern of selective forces. Nucleic Acids Res. 28: 2084-2090.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/28.10.2084
PMid:10773076 PMCid:105376
Sau K and Deb A (2009). Temperature influences synonymous codon and amino acid usage biases in the phages infecting extremely thermophilic prokaryotes. In Silico Biol. 9: 1-9.
PMid:19537157
Sharp PM and Li WH (1986). Codon usage in regulatory genes in Escherichia coli does not reflect selection for 'rare' codons. Nucleic Acids Res. 14: 7737-7749.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/14.19.7737
PMid:3534792 PMCid:311793
Sloan DB and Taylor DR (2010). Testing for selection on synonymous sites in plant mitochondrial DNA: the role of codon bias and RNA editing. J. Mol. Evol. 70: 479-491.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00239-010-9346-y
PMid:20424833
Wang B, Liu J, Jin L, Feng XY, et al. (2010). Complex mutation and weak selection together determined the codon usage bias in bryophyte mitochondrial genomes. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 52: 1100-1108.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7909.2010.00998.x
PMid:21106008
Wang B, Yuan J, Liu J, Jin L, et al. (2011). Codon usage bias and determining forces in green plant mitochondrial genomes. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 53: 324-334.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7909.2011.01033.x
PMid:21332641
Whittle CA, Sun Y and Johannesson H (2011). Evolution of synonymous codon usage in Neurospora tetrasperma and Neurospora discreta. Genome Biol. Evol. 3: 332-343.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/gbe/evr018
PMid:21402862 PMCid:3089379
Wright F (1990). The 'effective number of codons' used in a gene. Gene 87: 23-29.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0378-1119(90)90491-9
Xie T and Ding D (1998). The relationship between synonymous codon usage and protein structure. FEBS Lett. 434: 93-96.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0014-5793(98)00955-7
Zhang Y, Liu Y, Liu W, Zhou J, et al. (2011). Analysis of synonymous codon usage in hepatitis A virus. Virol. J. 8: 174.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-422X-8-174
PMid:21496278 PMCid:3087699
Zhou M and Li X (2009). Analysis of synonymous codon usage patterns in different plant mitochondrial genomes. Mol. Biol. Rep. 36: 2039-2046.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11033-008-9414-1
PMid:19005776